A comprehensive look at green bay packers vs detroit lions match player stats offers deep insight into both teams’ offensive efficiency, defensive efforts, and individual impact. Whether you’re a fan, analyst, or fantasy football follower, analyzing these stats reveals who controlled the line of scrimmage, who made crucial plays, and how each unit performed under pressure.
In games between these storied NFC North rivals, the green bay packers vs detroit lions match player stats often highlight contrasting strengths — strong ground games, passing efficiency, defensive stops, and situational execution. Below is a full statistical breakdown, followed by analysis of key performances and team strategies.
- Key Metrics for green bay packers vs detroit lions match player stats
- Original Stats Table — green bay packers vs detroit lions match player stats
- Analysis — What These green bay packers vs detroit lions match player stats Tell Us
- Conclusion
- FAQs — green bay packers vs detroit lions match player stats
Key Metrics for green bay packers vs detroit lions match player stats
When reviewing green bay packers vs detroit lions match player stats, certain metrics provide the richest insight:
Also, explore 954 Area Code: Complete Guide to Coverage, History, and Significance
- Passing Yards & Completion Percentage — reflects quarterback efficiency and passing game rhythm.
- Rushing Yards & Yards Per Carry — shows ground-game effectiveness and offensive balance.
- Receiving Yards & Targets — indicates wide receiver productivity and big-play potential.
- Touchdowns (Passing / Rushing / Receiving) — captures red-zone success and scoring output.
- Interceptions & Turnovers — highlight game-changing mistakes or defensive takeaways.
- Tackles, Sacks & Defensive Stops — gauge defensive pressure and disruption.
- Third-Down Conversions & Time of Possession — show control over game pace and drive management.
Original Stats Table — green bay packers vs detroit lions match player stats
Here is an original, illustrative stats table capturing key player performances from a hypothetical but realistic Packers–Lions game. Use this as a template for match recaps or analysis.
| Team | Player | CMP/ATT | PASS YDS | PASS TD | INT | RUSH (Att-Yds) | REC YDS | TOTAL TD | Tackles | Sacks |
| GB | Jordan Love | 24/35 | 267 | 2 | 1 | 8-14 | — | 0 | — | — |
| GB | Aaron Jones | — | — | — | — | 18-96 | — | 1 Rush | — | — |
| GB | AJ Dillon | — | — | — | — | 9-42 | — | 0 | — | — |
| GB | Christian Watson | — | — | — | — | — | 5-89 | 1 Rec | — | — |
| GB | Rashan Gary | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 8 | 2 |
| DET | Jared Goff | 23/33 | 254 | 1 | 2 | 5-12 | — | 0 | — | — |
| DET | David Montgomery | — | — | — | — | 20-83 | — | 1 Rush | — | — |
| DET | Amon-Ra St. Brown | — | — | — | — | — | 7-102 | 1 Rec | — | — |
| DET | James Houston IV | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 7 | 1 |
| DET | Sylvester Williams | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 5 | 1 |
Analysis — What These green bay packers vs detroit lions match player stats Tell Us
Offensive Balance & Efficiency
In this scenario, the Packers balanced both passing and rushing attacks. Jordan Love’s 267 passing yards and dual-threat presence from Aaron Jones and AJ Dillon highlight a diversified offensive output. On the other hand, Detroit relied heavily on its rushing game when possible and used Amon-Ra St. Brown’s receiving ability to stretch the field, showing playmaker impact.
Ground Game vs Air Attack
Green Bay’s strong ground gains from Jones (96 yards) and Dillon (42 yards) kept defensive pressure on Detroit, controlling time of possession. Detroit countered with Montgomery’s steady 83 rushing yards, maintaining balance. The contrasting approaches underscore each team’s offensive philosophy — rushing consistency for balance, and passing plus big plays for explosiveness.
Defensive Pressure & Turnovers
Rashan Gary’s 8 tackles and 2 sacks reflect strong defensive resilience and pass-rush effectiveness, pressuring Detroit’s quarterback and disrupting plays. On Detroit’s side, James Houston IV and Sylvester Williams contributed with tackles and a sack, showing moments of pressure but less overall dominance.
The turnover margin favored the Lions slightly due to interceptions, yet Packers’ ability to convert running plays and control the clock mitigated those mistakes — showcasing how ball control and drive efficiency can offset turnovers.
Big-Play Receivers Matter
Christian Watson’s 89 receiving yards and a touchdown demonstrated the value of explosive receivers in the passing game. Amon-Ra St. Brown’s 102 yards and receiving TD for Detroit underlined the importance of big-play ability in high-pressure matchups.
Conclusion
A full review of green bay packers vs detroit lions match player stats reveals a tightly contested game where strategic diversity — through balanced rushing and passing, defensive pressure, and big-play opportunities — shapes the outcome. Both teams displayed strengths: Green Bay via ground game control and defensive pressure, Detroit through explosive receiving and opportunistic turnovers.
These statistics go beyond mere box-score numbers — they offer insight into game flow, team identity, and individual performance under pressure. For anyone studying the matchup, green bay packers vs detroit lions match player stats provide a comprehensive roadmap for understanding the intricacies of modern NFL competition.
FAQs — green bay packers vs detroit lions match player stats
1. Which player had the most rushing yards in the match?
Aaron Jones led with 96 rushing yards for the Packers.
2. Who was the top receiver in this game?
Amon-Ra St. Brown recorded 102 receiving yards and a touchdown for Detroit.
3. Which defensive player made the biggest impact?
Rashan Gary stood out with 8 tackles and 2 sacks, applying consistent pressure on Detroit’s offense.
4. How balanced was the Packers’ offense in this matchup?
Very balanced — they combined over 250 passing yards with nearly 140 rushing yards, showing strong dual-threat capability.
5. Did turnovers decide the game?
While Detroit had two interceptions, Green Bay’s effective rushing, clock control, and defensive pressure helped offset the turnover disadvantage.